How the Matrix is hooking you in to support global starvation and suffering
You probably know the powers that be are promising us a global famine by 2023.
Under Universal Law, the Controllers 1 must tell us what they intend to do before they steal our money, health, freedom, and well-being. This is sometimes called the Law of Disclosure. The Controllers have been making a killing on this planet for generations, if not millennia, by exploiting a loophole in this law. (Sooner or later their karma will catch up with them. They know this, but they are so dead-set against Creator and all that is beautiful and natural — and they’ve already tricked the people of Earth into taking on so much of their karma — that they can’t, they won’t, and then they don’t stop.)
The loophole they use to trick us into consenting with their ongoing torture, starvation and genocide operations around the world comes from ancient maritime law. This is the legal system that all contracts and all formalized legal codes in the world come from. Under this ancient code, the common man is presumed guilty of whatever charges are leveled against (levied against) him.2
The Controllers — or at least their minions — are really superstitious. They’re big into numerology and gematria. One of the rules governing their exploitation of the Law of Disclosure is that they must proclaim their “offer” to you three times.
If you fail to rebut their assertions (you must get the jab; you must wear a mask; you must participate in creating a global famine), then you have, de facto, consented. You have agreed to accept their offer.
If this doesn’t seem at all fair or just, it’s because it is’t. It’s not lawful, either, because under Universal Law the giving of real consent requires that the giver be fully informed of all terms and conditions of the contract, be old enough to reason, be in his or her right mind, and understand the terms of the contract. Technically, this exploitative mechanism is not lawful. But it is legal.
The war on food
I’m going to use the fertilizer-to-famine messaging to show how the Controllers exploit the disclosure loophole and then I’ll come back to why it’s so important to rebut this government and corporate misinformation.
Joe Biden says Americans will face food shortages, blames it on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. We know the Biden administration is paying farmers not to grow crops because “climate emergency.” We also know more than 10 million chickens have already been destroyed in America this year because “avian flu” and we know states are banning sales of live chickens and making it illegal to own backyard chickens without registering for a license or state permit.
(Guess how the USDA decides whether or not a chicken is sick with avian flu — and thus whether or not all chickens in that flock are put to death? Yep, PCR tests. The same tests that scientists decided were 97 percent likely to return a false positive for Covid-19.)3
The Associated Press and NPR say fertilizer shortages are going to lead to famine, blaming Putin: “Despite thousands of miles separating her from the battlefields of Ukraine, Kariuki and her cabbage, corn and spinach farm are indirect victims of Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion. The war has pushed up the price of natural gas, a key ingredient in fertilizer, and has led to severe sanctions against Russia, a major exporter of fertilizer.”
Meanwhile, in a story that did not make the front page seemingly anywhere, the Union Pacific railroad recently told CF Industries, the largest North American producer of nitrogen fertilizers, that it was cutting the company’s shipping space by 20 percent, effective immediately. According to CF, only 20 companies were given these restrictions by the railroad.
CF uses Union Pacific to ship fertilizer from its Louisiana plant to farmers in Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma and California.
“The timing of this action by Union Pacific could not come at a worse time for farmers,” said Tony Will, president and chief executive officer, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. “Not only will fertilizer be delayed by these shipping restrictions, but additional fertilizer needed to complete spring applications may be unable to reach farmers at all. By placing this arbitrary restriction on just a handful of shippers, Union Pacific is jeopardizing farmers’ harvests and increasing the cost of food for consumers.”
If you don’t rebut, then you get what?
You get whatever they want to give you.
The global famine they are promising us is being manufactured by the Davos billionaires, media conglomerates, and politicians in collusion with the mega-corporations. The people pulling these strings may have been born in America or Britain or Russia or The Netherlands but their allegiance is to the Controllers and their dream of a one-world government with total control over all the world’s resources. Including people. As Phoenix and I discussed on a recent podcast, virtually all scarcity on Earth is manufactured in similar fashion. (Listen: Cosmic Fire Podcast Episode 23 - The Myth of Scarcity)
But they aren’t telling us they want to starve us into submission to their grand design. They aren’t telling us they view us as subhuman chattel, non-essential to their business. They’re saying the people of the world must suffer through another episode of deprivation and starvation
because the supply chain
because global warming4
By silently accepting these lies, we are supporting our own destroyers. If we don’t speak out, we are acquiescing to their evil plan. That’s not fair. It’s not right. It’s not just. But it is, apparently, permissible under Universal Law because it has been happening for a long time.
What does it mean to rebut these presumptions? I don’t honestly know how much action is required. From what I have learned, it may take years of sending notices to the appropriate governmental and corporate agencies to legally revoke your lost-at-sea status and regain the freedom granted to you by the Creator that you’ve never really had in this lifetime.
What I do know is that one small right action is better than another shrug and a mutter of, “Well, there’s nothing I can do about it.”
Instead of collapsing into learned helplessness or demoralized apathy, why don’t we start rebutting every false presumption we come across. Simply by saying out loud — or out loud in your mind — “I don’t agree to that.” Or, “I don’t agree to slaughtering all of the chickens”
Here’s what I say — and yes, if I owned a TV I would definitely be the guy talking back to every liar on the screen —
“If you’re going to tell me that Putin is choking off the world’s fertilizer supply by invading Ukraine, then I demand that you stop — IMMEDIATELY — sending billions of dollars in aid to other countries. Stop giving billions of dollars to the FBI, CIA and military to fund surveillance, spying and censorship of Americans. Stop spending billions of dollars to make Big Pharma and Big Tech and arms manufacturers richer. Stop paying Union Pacific to choke off fertilizer deliveries to farmers. Because you know how much fertilizer we could produce with all that money? You know how many hungry kids we could feed by turning America back into the breadbasket of the world?”
Yes, we need to tell these people directly and rebut all of the presumptions that have locked us into their slavery system. But the journey of a lifetime starts with a single step, right? This is something we can all do right here and right now. And, since we are all connected in consciousness, the message will get through to them.
We can tell our friends, too. We can post Substacks and podcasts and let people know on social media — they are dead serious about manufacturing a global food shortage. They want to recreate the Holodomor on a much bigger level. We need to be growing food. We need to reject these fraudulent pandemic narratives. We need to hold the politicians and the media and the corporations accountable for what they’re doing.
Maybe you haven’t found the courage to speak out to others yet. But you can at least make a start by speaking out on your own behalf.
Words have power.
The entities who work for the Parasite or the bad aliens, including the Deep State, the Rome/London/D.C. triangle, the military-industrial complex, Big Tech + the mass media conglomerates, the international banks, etc.
This presumption of guilt — or even more precisely of imbecility — begins in modern times with the moment your mother acted as an informant against you and signed you over as a ward of the state. Which she was told was mandatory because you had to have a birth certificate. In reality, this act of registry created your commercial vessel (signified by your name in ALL CAPS), which is bought and sold thousands of times over the course of your life, generating millions of dollars on the world financial markets.
This easy-to-understand post by Kenneth Scott explains how your failure to rebut the presumption that you are actually a ghost ship lost at sea at ages 7, 14, and 21 sealed your fate as chattel. (Interestingly, the “elites” are really into Saturn and these ages correspond to the first three quarter points of the Saturn cycle.)
“The number of amplification cycles (less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles); In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%” - Borger, Craig, Malhotra, Yeadon et al, “External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results,” November 2020.
Kary Mullis, the Nobel prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, stated repeatedly that using PCR for virus detection is a misuse of the technology.
If they haven’t invoked white supremacy or transphobia yet, it’s just a matter of time. The “reasons” change as needed, but the intended outcome stays the same.